The brand new Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Degree and you may attitudes level getting heterosexuals (LGB-KASH; Worthington et al

by Kurt Johnson

The brand new Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Degree and you may attitudes level getting heterosexuals (LGB-KASH; Worthington et al

The sample incorporated 154 heterosexual student students within the therapy (136 women and you may 18 male) who were gonna Russian personal and private colleges. Age varied out-of 17 to 51, with a suggest age 30.step three. Seventy-six participants have been off Moscow (society twelve.cuatro billion), and you will 78 had been of a tiny town about Southern away from Russia, Volgodonsk regarding the Rostov area, that has around 170,000 customers.

The evaluation devices every undergone as well as submit interpretation, and you can was basically given in the same purchase to all or any people. Participants expressed its concur of the participating in the analysis, no identifying pointers try collected. Undergraduate students inside public science courses in 2 universities have been welcome to participate in the study.

An example items about Dislike subscale has: “GLB some body are entitled to the fresh new hatred it found,” and you may in the GLB Civil-rights subscale: “I believe elizabeth-sex couples

, 2005). So it size try a beneficial 28-items survey, during the worry about-report function, and this tips five circumstances one determine one’s attitudes or degree of GLB somebody: dislike (6 things), knowledge (5 facts), religious dispute (eight affairs), GLB Civil rights (5 points), and Internalized Affirma-tiveness (5 activities). Those things was in fact measured on the a good 5-area Likert-sort of size (between “1-Very characteristic away from me” so you’re able to “5-Most uncharacteristic regarding me personally”). The fresh

countless for each subscale was added together to produce a substance scale. For it shot, precisely the subscales Hate (reverse coded) (Cronbach alpha = .83) and you will GLB Civil-rights (Cronbach alpha = .71) was basically included in the studies. “

Brand new NEo Five Basis Collection (NEO-FFI; Costa & McRae, 1992). So it 60-product instrument is actually an enthusiastic abbreviated sort of the brand new 24-item NEO-PI-Roentgen, hence methods four identification size (neuroticism, extraversion, transparency, agreeable-ness, and conscientiousness), having 12 situations provided for each domain. New NEO-FFI has notice-detailed statements you to definitely participants rates to the a beneficial 5-part Likert sorts of size (anywhere between step 1 = highly differ to 5 = highly agree). A sample product regarding neuroticism measure includes: “Whenever I’m around a great deal of stress, both I believe particularly I will pieces,” and you can on the conscientiousness size: “I have a very clear gang of wants and really works towards the all of them during the an organized trends.” Internal surface values for all scales ranged of .74 to help you .89.

social contact Issues. Several social contact questions looked in the event professionals had romantic nearest and dearest, household members, otherwise associates who had been gay otherwise lesbian.

The new answers was basically shared to make a variable showing people who have zero family, members of the family, or acquaintances, and those having relationships that have GLB anyone

With regards to Indicate Thinking, brand new design (pick Table dos) is actually high: F (seven, 131) = ; R2 = .498; p = .001. The fresh respondent’s area made a life threatening independent contribution from the set off history variables (fi = .616; p = .001), with

the quicker metropolitan mode regarding Volgodonsk part predicting greater Mean Perceptions. With regards to the next step, social experience of GLB someone made a hefty incremental sum so you’re able to Dislike (AR2 = .05; p = .001), exhibiting that a lot more interpersonal contact a person got with romantic friends, family, and colleagues who were GLB, the fresh new shorter Dislike it endorsed (fi = -.248; p = .001). In terms of character circumstances, both neuroticism (fi = .238; p = .001) and you can conscientiousness (fi = .195; p = .009) were predictive out-of Suggest Attitudes (AR2 = .06; p = .001); almost every other personality factors failed to predict hateful thinking.

Brand new design exploring predictors off feedback away from GLB Civil-rights (come across Table step three) has also been tall: F (7, 131) = 7.205; R2 = .28; p = .001. When it comes to record details, one another women gender (ft = -.299; p = .001) and you can Moscow area (feet = -.422; p = .001) by themselves and https://internationalwomen.net/no/meksikanske-kvinner/ you can seriously predicted better approval out of GLB Legal rights. But not, interpersonal contact did not rather sign up to new variance above and you will not in the record details (AR2 = .04; p = .297). Finally, the addition of brand new personality situations don’t sign up to the brand new design, no matter if neuroticism reached value (base = -.162; p = .061), indicating that there tends to be a love anywhere between neuroticism and you can lack out of service to own GLB Legal rights.

0 Comments:

Leave a Reply